##PAGE1##

Office Notes,

reports, orders

or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions

No

and Registrar’s

order with

Signatures

WPCRL 1764/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kum ar Tiw ari, J.

Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.

Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate, i/b Mr.

Ravindra S. Rawat, Advocate for the

petitioners.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Brief

Holder, for the State.

(2) Petitioners have approached this

Court for protection. According to them, they

were in love and they got married as per

Hindu rites and customs on 18.12.2025 and

due to their marriage against the wish of

relatives of petitioner no. 1, they are facing

threat to their life and liberty. As per the

documents enclosed with the writ petition,

both the petitioners are major.

(3) Petitioners, duly identified by their

Counsel, appeared before us. Petitioners

stated that they are serving as Panchkarm

Therapist; petitioner no. 1 is serving as such

at Rohtak in State of Haryana, while

petitioner no. 2 is serving as Panchkarm

Therapist at Dwarka, New Delhi. Petitioners

apprised that since there is difference in

caste as petitioner no. 1 belongs to Brahmin

community and petitioner no. 2 belongs to

Saini community and this is the reason of

annoyance of the family members of

petitioner no. 1.

(4) Learned State Counsel submits

that he has no objection against the prayer

for protection made by petitioners as both

the petitioners are major, as per the

documents enclosed with the writ petition.

However, protection can be provided to them

only when they visit the native place of

petitioner no. 2 at Haridwar and they shall

give prior information of their impending

visit to concerned SHO.

(5) Having regard to the aforesaid

facts and reasons, writ petition is disposed of

with a direction to the SHO, PS Laksar,

District Haridwar to provide adequate

protection to petitioners, whenever they visit

Haridwar, for a period of ten weeks to

ensure that no harm is caused to them from

the private respondents or any other person

acting on their behest. Upon expiry of ten

weeks, SHO concerned shall look into the

threat perception to petitioners and take

appropriate action, as deemed necessary.

Petitioners shall given prior information of

their impending visit to Haridwar to SHO

concerned.

(6) Let certified copy of this order be

supplied to learned Counsel, today itself, on

payment of usual charges.

(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

23.12.2025

Pr

PRABODH KUMAR DiNg:tca=2lI0y s,5o.1nedG3b8CPRA4BTO+FHK'UMN,ou=IGCFKND,2.540=3a89f17c6eb9d, postlC=UTARKHNDrialumb0C1E8A6B94F52739E, cn=PRODHKUM