HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
BHAWANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.
Date or directions No and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPCRL 1764/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate, i/b Mr.
Ravindra S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioners.
Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Brief Holder, for the State.
(2) Petitioners have approached this Court for protection. According to them, they were in love and they got married as per Hindu rites and customs on 18.12.2025 and due to their marriage against the wish of relatives of petitioner no. 1, they are facing threat to their life and liberty. As per the documents enclosed with the writ petition, both the petitioners are major.
(3) Petitioners, duly identified by their Counsel, appeared before us. Petitioners stated that they are serving as Panchkarm Therapist; petitioner no. 1 is serving as such at Rohtak in State of Haryana, while petitioner no. 2 is serving as Panchkarm Therapist at Dwarka, New Delhi. Petitioners apprised that since there is difference in Saini community and this is the reason of annoyance of the family members of petitioner no. 1.
(4) Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection against the prayer
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.