SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 46043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
BHAWANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings SL.

Date or directions No and Registrar’s order with Signatures WPCRL 1764/ 2025 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.

Mr. Rohit Kumar, Advocate, i/b Mr.

Ravindra S. Rawat, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Rakesh Kumar Joshi, Brief Holder, for the State.

(2) Petitioners have approached this Court for protection. According to them, they were in love and they got married as per Hindu rites and customs on 18.12.2025 and due to their marriage against the wish of relatives of petitioner no. 1, they are facing threat to their life and liberty. As per the documents enclosed with the writ petition, both the petitioners are major.

(3) Petitioners, duly identified by their Counsel, appeared before us. Petitioners stated that they are serving as Panchkarm Therapist; petitioner no. 1 is serving as such at Rohtak in State of Haryana, while petitioner no. 2 is serving as Panchkarm Therapist at Dwarka, New Delhi. Petitioners apprised that since there is difference in Saini community and this is the reason of annoyance of the family members of petitioner no. 1.

(4) Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection against the prayer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top