HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Civil Revision No. 100 of 2025 Anupama Prakash. ………..Revisionist.

Versus Anirudh Singh and others. ……..Respondents Present:

Mr. Siddhartha Sah, learned counsel for the revisionist. Mr.Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the respondents.

Hon’ble Rakesh Thapliyal, J.

1. Heard learned counsel for the parties at length.

2. The instant revision is arising out of an order passed by the trial court dated 15.09.2025 rejecting the application moved by the defendant under Order 7 Rule 11 of CPC.

3. Brief facts of the case are that a suit was filed by respondent / plaintiff seeking declaration of five sale deeds as null and void as the same are forged and also praying for permanent injunction restraining the defendant from interfering in the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs.

4. Mr. Siddharath Sah, learned counsel for the revisionist argued that suit is not maintainable at all, as the same is filed on fictitious grounds without any substance and in respect of the five sale deeds there is no cause of action except one sale deed. There are five sale deeds, two sale deeds were executed on 21.01.2025 and three sale deeds were executed on 11.02.2025, 13.02.2025 and