SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 84043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHD ARSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Reserved on 19.11.2025 Delivered on 19.12.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Criminal Revision No.109 of 2024 Mohd. Arshad ......Revisionist Vs.

State of Uttarakhand & Others …..Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

1. Mr. Bilal Ahmed, learned counsel for the Revisionist.

2. Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned A.G.A. for the State.

3. Mr. Pranav Singh and Mr. Manvendra Singh, learned counsel for the Respondent nos.2 & 3.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Ashish Naithani, J.

The present Criminal Revision has been instituted under Sections 397 and 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, read with Section 19 sub-section (4) of the Family Courts Act to question the legality and correctness of the judgment and order dated 01.12.2023 passed by the Judge, Family Court, Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun in Misc. Case No. 36 of 2022, whereby the application under Section 125 CrPC filed by Respondent No. 2 was allowed and the Revisionist was directed to pay maintenance of `

10,000/- per month to the Respondent no.2 (wife) and `

8,000/- per month to the minor daughter i.e. Respondent no.3.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top