SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 96043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUSHIL KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
MOHD SHAN AHMAD – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . . D e a t an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS order with Signatures WPMS No. 3519 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. Nagesh Aggarwal, learned counsel for the Petitioner.

2. The present Writ Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been filed with the following prayers:

“(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 11.09.2025 passed by the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun in S.C.C. Execution No. 2 of 2025, Sushil Kumar vs. Mohd. Shan Ahmad and Another, whereby the execution proceedings arising out of ex- parte decree dated 12.03.2025 in S.C.C. Suit No. 19 of 2024 have been illegally stayed;

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Dehradun, to proceed expeditiously with the execution proceedings in S.C.C. Execution No. 02 of 2025 in accordance with law, without being influenced by the pendency of the respondents restoration application.”

3. The Petitioner has also filed an Stay Application (I.A. No. 01 of 2025) with a prayer that

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top