SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 137043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VINOD KUMAR SEN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings S N L o . . D e a t an o d r d R i e re g c is t t io ra n r s ’ s COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS order with Signatures CRLR No. 884 of 2025 Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the Revisionist.

2. Mr. G.C. Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. The present Criminal Revision has been preferred against the judgment and order dated 20.08.2024, passed by the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Haldwani, District Nainital, in Criminal Case No. 1892 of 2013 (4500 of 2013), titled as “State of Uttarakhand vs. Vinod Kumar Sen and Another”, whereby the Revisionist was convicted for the offence punishable under Section 420 of the IPC and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for one year along with a fine of ₹10,000/-, and in default of payment of fine, to undergo further simple imprisonment for one month.The Revisionist has also challenged the subsequent judgment and order dated 26.11.2025, passed by the learned Second Additional Sessions Judge, Haldwani, District Nainital, in Criminal Appeal No. 68 of 2024, titled as “Vinod Kumar Sen vs. State of Uttarakhand”, whereby the learned Appellate Court dis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top