SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 146043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SMT SHABANA – Appellant
Versus
MEHMOOD HASAN – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition No.836 (M/S) of 2023 Smt. Shabana ………Petitioner Versus Mehboob Hasan and others ………Respondents Mr. Siddhartha Singh with Mr. D.S. Negi, Advocates for the petitioner.

Mr. Shubhang Dobhal, Advocate for respondent no.3 Mr. M.S. Tyagi, Sr. Advocate assisted by Mr. Sunil Chandra, Advocate for respondent no.4/2-Naseem.

Mr. Vijay Bhatt, Advocate for respondent nos.4 to 20.

Mr. Sagar Kothari, Advocate for respondent nos.40 and 41.

None for rest of the respondents.

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

By means of present writ petition, the petitioner/plaintiff has put to challenge the order dated st

16.08.2021 passed by the Assistant Collector, 1 Class/S.D.O., Sadar, Dehradun in Original Suit No.42 of 2017-18, Meharban Ali and others vs. Alauddin and others, whereby the Amendment Application moved by the petitioner/plaintiff was rejected and at the same time, the suit was also dismissed. Petitioner has also challenged the subsequent orders passed by the First and Second Appellate Authorities dated 12.10.2022 and 13.01.2023.

2. The facts of the case are that the petitioner along with respondents Nos. 24 and 25 instituted Partition Case No. 42 of 2017–

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top