SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 169043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ANOOP AGRAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Reserved on:17.11.2025 Delivered on:18.12.2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL Writ Petition (Criminal) No.63 of 2024 Anoop Agrawal and Another ......Petitioners Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and Ors. …..Respondents Presence Mr. Aditya Singh, learned counsel for the Petitioners.

Mr. Vipul Painuly, learned AGA, for state.

Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, learned counsel for Respondent No.3.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

1. The present writ petition arises out of FIR No. 551 of 2023 registered at Police Station Kashipur for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 384, 504 and 506 IPC. The Petitioners challenge two orders passed by the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, namely, the order dated 17.11.2023 issuing a proclamation under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure and the subsequent order dated 03.01.2024 initiating attachment under Section 83 of the Code.

2. As per the FIR lodged by Respondent No. 3, the Petitioners had allegedly threatened him for money and, on 22.10.2023, arrived at Ramleela Maidan along with several persons armed with weapons, assaulted him and fired a gunshot which narrowly missed. Respondent No. 3 claims to have suffered injuries but states that he did no

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top