SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 181043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
BABAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

18TH DECEMBER, 2025 FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.2432 of 2025 Babar ..…Applicant Versus State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Akshay Latwal, Assistant Government Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

Applicant-Babar is in judicial custody for the offence punishable under Section 8 read with Section 22 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (in short, “Act, 1985”) in Case Crime No.868 of 2025, registered at Police Station Laksar, District Haridwar.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 03.09.2025, the police apprehended the applicant on suspicion. He was searched. He kept a polythene bag in his right pocket. The police recovered 96 capsules of Dicyclomine Hydrochloride Tramadol, Hydrochloride & Acetaminophen with total quantity of

59.52 gm. He was arrested at 18:10 hrs.

3. Heard Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate for respondent.

4. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, contended that the applicant is an innocent per

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top