SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 263043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NAIM AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 1111 of 2025 (M/S)

Naim Ahmad ….......Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others ..…..... Respondents

Present : Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi and Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocates for the

petitioner.

Mr. Mahendra Singh Bisht, Brief Holder for the State/respondent

no.1.

Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the respondent no.3.

With

Writ Petition No. 1122 of 2025 (M/S)

Mohd. Javed ….......Petitioner

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and others ..…..... Respondents

Present : Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi and Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocates for the

petitioner.

Mr. Mahendra Singh Bisht, Brief Holder for the State/respondent

no.1.

Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.

Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the respondent no.3.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

Counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 in

WPMS No.1111 of 2025 and counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 in WPMS No. 1122 of 2025 are taken on record. Misc. Application (IA) Nos.3 of 2025 and 3 of 2025 respectively,

stand disposed of accordingly.

2. Since common question of facts and law involved in both these writ petitions, they are heard together and are

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top