HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NAIM AHMAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 1111 of 2025 (M/S)
Naim Ahmad ….......Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others ..…..... Respondents
Present : Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi and Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocates for the
petitioner.
Mr. Mahendra Singh Bisht, Brief Holder for the State/respondent
no.1.
Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the respondent no.3.
With
Writ Petition No. 1122 of 2025 (M/S)
Mohd. Javed ….......Petitioner
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and others ..…..... Respondents
Present : Mr. Ghanshyam Joshi and Mr. Mohd. Azim, Advocates for the
petitioner.
Mr. Mahendra Singh Bisht, Brief Holder for the State/respondent
no.1.
Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent no.2.
Mr. Sanjay Kumar, Advocate for the respondent no.3.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
Counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 in
WPMS No.1111 of 2025 and counter affidavit filed on behalf of respondent no. 2 in WPMS No. 1122 of 2025 are taken on record. Misc. Application (IA) Nos.3 of 2025 and 3 of 2025 respectively,
stand disposed of accordingly.
2. Since common question of facts and law involved in both these writ petitions, they are heard together and are
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.