SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 264043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HIMANI JOSHI – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (S/S) No.2423 of 2024

Himani Joshi ...Petitioner

Versus

Bar Council of India and others ….Respondents

Present:

Mr. Chetan Joshi, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Tiwari, Advocate for the respondent no.1.

Mr. D.S. Patni, Senior Advocate, assisted by Mr. Dharmendra

Barthwal, Advocate for the respondent no.2 Dr. K.H. Gupta, Advocate for the intervener. Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.(Oral)

By means of instant petition, the petitioner has sought

the following reliefs:-

“(i) Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of

certiorari calling for the records of the case and set aside/quash the order dated 25-9-2024 (Annexure

1) and resolution dated 4-1-2021 (Annexure 2).

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere in the peaceful working of the petitioner as Office Superintendent in the Office of Bar Council

of Uttarakhand, Nainital.

(iii) Any other Relief which this Hon’ble Court may

deem just and fit in the circumstances of the case

may also be granted.

(iv) Award Cost of the Writ Petition.”

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the

record.

3. It is the claim of the petitione

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top