SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 274043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANIYA PARVEEN AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE CHI EF JUSTI CE MR. G. NARENDAR

AND

THE HON’BLE JUSTI CE MR. ALOK MAHRA

Writ Petition (Criminal) No. 829 of 2025

1st August, 2025

Saniya Parveen and Another --Petitioners

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Ms. Manju Bahuguna, learned counsel for the petitioners.

Mr. J.S. Virk, learned Deputy Advocate General with Mr. Rakesh

Joshi, learned Brief Holder for the State.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

JUDGMENT: (per Mr. G. Narendar, C.J.

Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and

learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of

Uttarakhand.

2. It is submitted that both the petitioners belong to the same faith, and that the petitioners developed a liking for each other, which has ended in marriage, and now both the petitioners are living together. Since the family members of petitioner no.1 are against this marriage, they are giving out threats to

kill both the petitioners. Petitioners submit that they are facing stiff resistance, and they seriously apprehend threat to their life and limb from the family

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top