SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 283043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DOON TAXI OWNERS ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 3258 of 2023 ( m/S)

Doon Taxi Owners Association, Taxi Stand,

Railway Station ….......Petitioner

Vs.

Union of India and others …..... Respondents

Present : Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Central Government Standing Counsel for the

Union of India.

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

This matter was finally heard today and the Court

proceeded to dictate the judgment. At that stage, it was revealed that the notice was required to be issued to the respondent no.3 on 30.11.2023, but notices have yet not been issued. Steps have not

been taken.

2. Let fresh notice be issued to the respondent no.3,

returnable within six weeks. Steps to be taken within a week.

3. In case, the petitioner fails to take steps, the petition

shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.

4. Heard on Stay Application (IA No. 1 of 2023).

5. According to the petitioner, they are operating taxi services at Dehradun Railway Station since 1991; their Association was permitted to park minimum 05 taxies at a time on certain charges, but the respondent no.2/Divisional Railway Manager, DRM, Northern Railways, Moradabad Division, Moradabad (“the D

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top