HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
DOON TAXI OWNERS ASSOCIATION – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Writ Petition No. 3258 of 2023 ( m/S)
Doon Taxi Owners Association, Taxi Stand,
Railway Station ….......Petitioner
Vs.
Union of India and others …..... Respondents
Present : Mr. I.P. Kohli, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Manoj Kumar, Central Government Standing Counsel for the
Union of India.
Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)
This matter was finally heard today and the Court
proceeded to dictate the judgment. At that stage, it was revealed that the notice was required to be issued to the respondent no.3 on 30.11.2023, but notices have yet not been issued. Steps have not
been taken.
2. Let fresh notice be issued to the respondent no.3,
returnable within six weeks. Steps to be taken within a week.
3. In case, the petitioner fails to take steps, the petition
shall stand dismissed without reference to the Court.
4. Heard on Stay Application (IA No. 1 of 2023).
5. According to the petitioner, they are operating taxi services at Dehradun Railway Station since 1991; their Association was permitted to park minimum 05 taxies at a time on certain charges, but the respondent no.2/Divisional Railway Manager, DRM, Northern Railways, Moradabad Division, Moradabad (“the D
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.