SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 287043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANDEEP SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

04th AUGUST, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 631 OF 2025

Sandeep Sharma ..... Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Rajat Mittal,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pradeep Lohani,

Brief Holder.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application has been filed by the

applicant Sandeep Sharma for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.260 of 2025, registered at Police Station SIDCUL, District Haridwar under Sections 323, 377,

498A, 504 & 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

2. As per the First Information Report dated 27.05.2025, the informant was married to the applicant on 19.06.2014. They have two children. The applicant

used to behave cruelly towards her and beat her.

3. Heard Mr. Rajat Mittal, learned counsel for

Holder for the respondent.

the respondent has opposed the anticipatory bail

application and submitted that the investigation against the applicant is pending for the offence under Sections 323, 498A, 504 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.

5. Mr. Rajat Mittal, Advocate, submitted that the allegations are totally baseless. He never mis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top