SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 299043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AMIT RASTOGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No.736 of 2023

Amit Rastogi --Revisionist

Versus

State and another

--Respondents

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the revisionist.

Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State.

Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, learned legal aid counsel for respondent

no.2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2. This revision is directed against the order dated 28.08.2023 passed by learned Judge, Family Court-I, Rudrapur, District U.S. Nagar in Case No.234 of 2022, whereby the Court, while setting aside the ex parte order dated 31.08.2022 passed earlier, has

imposed four conditions.

3. It is reflected from the revision that the order impugned has imposed inter alia condition nos.2 and 3 whereby the Family Court while setting aside the ex part order, directed the revisionist –husband to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as interim maintenance till the disposal of application u/s 125 Cr.P.C. and further, to pay at least 50% of total maintenance to be paid in pursuant of the

said order till date.

4. The re

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top