HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AMIT RASTOGI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL
Criminal Revision No.736 of 2023
Amit Rastogi --Revisionist
Versus
State and another
--Respondents
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Presence:-
Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the revisionist.
Mr. S.C. Dumka, learned AGA for the State.
Mr. Digvijay Singh Bisht, learned legal aid counsel for respondent
no.2.
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Heard learned Counsel for the parties.
2. This revision is directed against the order dated 28.08.2023 passed by learned Judge, Family Court-I, Rudrapur, District U.S. Nagar in Case No.234 of 2022, whereby the Court, while setting aside the ex parte order dated 31.08.2022 passed earlier, has
imposed four conditions.
3. It is reflected from the revision that the order impugned has imposed inter alia condition nos.2 and 3 whereby the Family Court while setting aside the ex part order, directed the revisionist –husband to pay a sum of Rs.5,000/- as interim maintenance till the disposal of application u/s 125 Cr.P.C. and further, to pay at least 50% of total maintenance to be paid in pursuant of the
said order till date.
4. The re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.