SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 310043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
VIBHOR RANA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No.308 of 2023

Vibhor Rana --Revisionist

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and another

--Respondents

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Nalin Saun, learned counsel for the revisionist.

Mr. S.S. Chauhan, learned Dy.A.G. for the State.

Mr. Ankur Sharma, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

This revision has been filed seeking to set aside

the ex parte judgment dated 02.09.2022 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Vikas Nagar, District Dehradun in Case No.92 of 2022, Deepa Rana v. Vibhor Rana u/s 125 Cr.P.C., order dated 21.04.2023 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Vikas Nagar, Dehradun in Misc. Case No.225 of 2022, Deepa Rana v. Vibhor Rana u/s 125(3) Cr.P.C. and order dated 21.04.2023 passed by learned Judge, Family Court, Vikas Nagar in Misc. Case No.259 of 2022,

Vibhor Rana v. Deepa Rana u/s 126(2) Cr.P.C.

2. Facts of the case are that an application u/s 125 Cr.P.C. was filed by respondent no.2 against the revisionist seeking maintenance. In that application , she prayed for payment of Rs.50,000/- p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top