HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UMESH KUMAR TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPSB/ 165/ 2020
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. (Per: Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.)
1. Mohd Matloob, learned counsel for
the petitioner.
2. Mr. P.S. Bisht, learned Additional
C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Petitioner suffers from 60 percent disability. According to him, he was entitled for promotion against a vacancy reserved for physically disabled person, however, his claim was not considered. In this writ petition, petitioner has
sought the following reliefs:-
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature
of certiorari quashing the order dated
10.06.2019 (Annexure No. 10).
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature
of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 1 & 2 to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Regional Manager against one post falling within the category of 4% reservation under RPWD Act from the post of Divisional Sales Manager which is occupied by the petitioner who is a physically disabled person with benchmark disability and is occupied the same on his merit which is the post of feeding ca
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.