SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 314043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
UMESH KUMAR TRIPATHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSB/ 165/ 2020

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J. (Per: Hon’ble Manoj K. Tiwari, J.)

1. Mohd Matloob, learned counsel for

the petitioner.

2. Mr. P.S. Bisht, learned Additional

C.S.C. for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Petitioner suffers from 60 percent disability. According to him, he was entitled for promotion against a vacancy reserved for physically disabled person, however, his claim was not considered. In this writ petition, petitioner has

sought the following reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature

of certiorari quashing the order dated

10.06.2019 (Annexure No. 10).

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature

of mandamus commanding the respondent no. 1 & 2 to consider the petitioner for promotion to the post of Regional Manager against one post falling within the category of 4% reservation under RPWD Act from the post of Divisional Sales Manager which is occupied by the petitioner who is a physically disabled person with benchmark disability and is occupied the same on his merit which is the post of feeding ca

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top