SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 321043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Harish Chandra Gururani – Appellant
Versus
Anoop Agarwal – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Misc. Application U/s 482 No. 470 of 2017

06 August, 2025

Harish Chandra Gururani ………Applicant

Versus

Anoop Agarwal and Another ………Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. K.P. Upadhyay, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr.

Hemant Pant, learned counsel for the applicant.

Ms. Priya Mewari, learned counsel for respondent no.1.

Mr. B.N. Molakhi along with Mr. Deepak Bisht, learned Deputy

A.G. for the State/respondent no.2.

---------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Mr. Alok Mahra, J.

The present application under Section 482

Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the impugned judgment and order dated 27.03.2017 passed by the learned 2nd Additional District & Sessions Judge, Nainital in Criminal Revision No. 93 of 2016 (Harish Chandra Gururani vs. Anoop Agarwal & Another), and the cognizance/ summoning order dated 02.08.2016 passed by the learned 1st Additional Civil Judge (Junior Division)/Judicial Magistrate, Nainital in Criminal Case No. 616 of 2016, whereby summons were issued to the applicant under Sections 420 & 421 IPC as well as to quash the entire proceedings

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top