HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL

07 August, 2025

Deepa --Revisionist

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Another --Respondent

With

Criminal Revision No. 176 of 2020

Amit Prakash --Revisionist

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Another --Respondent

--------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Ayush Agarwal, learned counsel holding brief of Mr. Akhil Kumar Sah,

Advocate for the revisionist in CRLR/233/2020.

Mr. Dinesh Chauhan, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the

State/respondent no.1.

Mr. Ajay Singh Bisht, learned counsel for respondent no.2 in CRLR/233/2020. --------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.

The delay in filing the present criminal

revisions is not opposed by learned counsel for the opposite parties. For the reasons stated in the accompanying affidavits to the delay condonation applications, the delay condonation applications are allowed and the delay in preferring the criminal

revisions is condoned.

2. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these two revisions, therefore, they are

heard together and are being decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity, facts of co