SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 331043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANOJ – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Criminal Revision No. 488 of 2025

07 August, 2025

Manoj --Revisionist

Versus

State Of Uttarakhand and Others --Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Ankur Sharma, learned counsel for the revisionist.

Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned A.G.A. for the

State of Uttarakhand/respondent No.1. Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J. (Oral)

By means of the present criminal revision, the

revisionist-husband has put to challenge the impugned judgment and order dated 04.06.2025 passed by learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, Rishikesh, District Dehradun, in Misc. Case No.49 of 2021 Smt. Pooja Singh and another Vs. Sh. Manoj, whereby, the application under Section 125 Cr.P.C. filed by the respondent No.2-wife was rejected, while application filed by respondent No.3-minor son for maintenance allowance was partly allowed and the revisionist was directed to pay Rs.4,000/-per month as maintenance to respondent No.3-minor son from the

date of filing that application.

2. Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that the impugned judgment and order passed by the learned Trial Court is based upon the conjecture and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top