SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 338043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Piyush Jain – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

C482 No.1389 of 2016

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Kailash Chandra, learned

counsel for the applicants.

2. Mr. V. N. Maulekhi, learned DAG for

the State.

3. The criminal misc. application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the cognizance order dated 30.10.2014, passed by the ACJM, 2nd Dehradun as well as the entire proceedings of Case Crime No.357 of 2013 (Criminal Case No.97 of 2015),’ under Sections 498A, 504, 506 of IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of 2nd Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, District,

Dehradun.

4. Heard learned counsel for the

parties.

5. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants that it is purely a matrimonial dispute between the parties; compromise has taken place between the parties; accordingly, both the parties (husband (applicant no.1) and wife (respondent no.3) moved an application under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun, which was allowed vide order

dated 16.11.2015.

6. From the perusal of the record, it is clear that written infor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top