HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Piyush Jain – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
C482 No.1389 of 2016
Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.
Mr. Kailash Chandra, learned
counsel for the applicants.
2. Mr. V. N. Maulekhi, learned DAG for
the State.
3. The criminal misc. application has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. for quashing the cognizance order dated 30.10.2014, passed by the ACJM, 2nd Dehradun as well as the entire proceedings of Case Crime No.357 of 2013 (Criminal Case No.97 of 2015),’ under Sections 498A, 504, 506 of IPC and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the court of 2nd Addl. Chief Judicial Magistrate, District,
Dehradun.
4. Heard learned counsel for the
parties.
5. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicants that it is purely a matrimonial dispute between the parties; compromise has taken place between the parties; accordingly, both the parties (husband (applicant no.1) and wife (respondent no.3) moved an application under Section 13B of Hindu Marriage Act before the Principal Judge, Family Court, Dehradun, which was allowed vide order
dated 16.11.2015.
6. From the perusal of the record, it is clear that written infor
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.