HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SURENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS/ 2006/ 2023
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Davesh Bishnoi, learned counsel
for the petitioner.
2. Mr. S.K. Nainwal, learned Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for
respondent nos. 3 & 4.
4. Petitioner is a senior citizen. He moved an application under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 before the Tribunal, constituted under Section 7 of the Act, for cancellation of gift deed dated 02.08.2010 executed in favour of his son (respondent no. 3), which was dismissed. Petitioner thereafter approached learned Appellate Tribunal by filing appeal. His appeal too has been dismissed vide judgment dated 20.02.2023. Thus, feeling aggrieved,
petitioner has approached this Court.
5. Heard learned counsel for the
parties and perused the record.
6. Learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate / Tribunal, Udham Singh Nagar rejected petitioner’s application by holding that there was no condition in the gift deed that respondent no. 3 will provide the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the petitioner. L
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.