SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 362043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SURENDRA SINGH – Appellant
Versus
COLLECTOR/ DISTRICT MAGISTRATE – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS/ 2006/ 2023

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Davesh Bishnoi, learned counsel

for the petitioner.

2. Mr. S.K. Nainwal, learned Standing

Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Piyush Garg, learned counsel for

respondent nos. 3 & 4.

4. Petitioner is a senior citizen. He moved an application under Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007 before the Tribunal, constituted under Section 7 of the Act, for cancellation of gift deed dated 02.08.2010 executed in favour of his son (respondent no. 3), which was dismissed. Petitioner thereafter approached learned Appellate Tribunal by filing appeal. His appeal too has been dismissed vide judgment dated 20.02.2023. Thus, feeling aggrieved,

petitioner has approached this Court.

5. Heard learned counsel for the

parties and perused the record.

6. Learned Sub-Divisional Magistrate / Tribunal, Udham Singh Nagar rejected petitioner’s application by holding that there was no condition in the gift deed that respondent no. 3 will provide the basic amenities and basic physical needs to the petitioner. L

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top