SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 366043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANJAY PATHAK – Appellant
Versus
JOINT CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition (M/S) No. 2354 of 2025

Sanjay Pathak ….....Petitioner

Versus

Joint Chief Administrator and others ….….Respondents

Present:-

Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondents.

JUDGMENT

Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. (Oral)

The challenge in this petition is made to the following:-

(i) Order dated 22.07.2022, passed by the respondent

no.3/the Vice Chairman, District Level Development Authority, Nainital (“the Authority”) passed under Section 27 of the Uttarakhand Urban Planning and Development Act, 1973 (“the Act”). By which,

demolition order has been passed.

(ii) Judgment and order dated 05.06.2024 passed by the

respondent no.2/Chairman of the Authority in appeal under Section 28 of the Act. By it, the appeal has

been dismissed; and

(iii) Order dated 22.07.2025, passed in Revision No. 18 of

2024, Sanjay Pathak Vs. Secretary, District Level Development Authority by the respondent no.1/Joint Chief Administrator, Uttarakhand Housing and Urban Development Authority, Dehradun. By it, the

revision has been dismissed.

2. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record.

3. It is the case of the petitio

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top