SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 383043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANAS KUMAR HAZARA – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL ALLAHABAD – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL

Writ Petition Service Bench No.576 of 2017

11 August, 2025

Manas Kumar Hazara --Petitioner

Versus

Central Administrative Tribunal Allahabad --Respondent --------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Piyush Garg, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Pankaj Chaturvedi, Standing Counsel for the Union of India.

Mr. Yogesh Pacholia and Mr. Yogesh Kumar Sharma, Advocate for respondent

no.4.

--------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.

(Per: Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is challenging judgment and order

dated 23.02.2016 rendered by Central Administrative Tribunal, Allahabad Bench (Circuit Sitting at Nainital) in Original Application No.331/00007/2015 (Manas Kumar Hazra Vs. Union of India and Others). By the said judgment, challenge to reversion order made by the

petitioner, was rejected.

2. Petitioner possess diploma in Mechanical Engineering, which he obtained while serving as Machinist in Opto Electronics Factory Dehradun. The said diploma was obtained through distance mode from Janardan Rai Nagar Rajasthan Vidyapeeth (deemed) University

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top