HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
IRSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAI NI TAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
11th AUGUST, 2025
ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 636 of 2025
Irshad ..... Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand and Others ..…Respondents
Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Birendra Singh
Adhikari, Advocate and Mr.
Mohd. Safdar, Advocate.
Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Nos.1 and 2 Assistant Government
Advocate.
Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate
No.3- Informant
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
This Application has been filed by the applicant-
Irshad seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.10 of 2024, registered at Kotwali Dehradun, District Dehradun under Sections 420, 467, 468 & Section 471 of the Indian
Penal Code, 1860.
2. According to the First Information Report dated 03.01.2024, one Mohan Prasad Kala and Anil Kala purchased a land on 16.09.2004 from Sabarmal Agarwal. The named accused Ashok Kumar sold the land to other person through a forged registered Power of Attorney dated 27.05.2003, whereas Sabarmal Agarwal had not executed
any such power of attorney.
3. Heard Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned Assista
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.