SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 390043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
IRSHAD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

11th AUGUST, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 636 of 2025

Irshad ..... Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Others ..…Respondents

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Birendra Singh

Adhikari, Advocate and Mr.

Mohd. Safdar, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, Nos.1 and 2 Assistant Government

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. D.S. Mehta, Advocate

No.3- Informant

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This Application has been filed by the applicant-

Irshad seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.10 of 2024, registered at Kotwali Dehradun, District Dehradun under Sections 420, 467, 468 & Section 471 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 03.01.2024, one Mohan Prasad Kala and Anil Kala purchased a land on 16.09.2004 from Sabarmal Agarwal. The named accused Ashok Kumar sold the land to other person through a forged registered Power of Attorney dated 27.05.2003, whereas Sabarmal Agarwal had not executed

any such power of attorney.

3. Heard Mr. Birendra Singh Adhikari, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Pratiroop Pandey, learned Assista

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top