SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 432043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Zulfiqar Ahmad Alias Zullaa – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

C482 No.794 of 2017

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Mr. Parth Tamta, Advocate, holding

brief of Mr. Bhuwan Bhatt, Advocate for the

applicant.

Mr. Deepak Bisht, Deputy Advocate

General for the State of Uttarakhand.

2. Facts of the case, in a nutshell, are that respondent no.2-Smt. Chandrakanta moved a complaint before Police Station Bhagwanpur, District Haridwar against the applicant and four others for lodging an F.I.R. against them for the offences punishable under Section 354, 323, 147, 504, 506 I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(10) of S.C./S.T. Act. After investigation, the Police submitted the Final Report. In the Final Report, it is stated that there is a suit pending between the respondent no.2 and the applicant in the Court of Consolidation Officer and that the respondent no.2 have no medical evidence regarding the injuries and since both the parties belong to Scheduled Caste community, therefore, the offences punishable under Section 3(1)(10) of S.C./S.T. Act are not applicable to the present case. The said Final Report was accepted by the Magistrate on 04.09.2013. Against

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top