SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 441043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
JASVINDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

18th AUGUST, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 160 OF 2025

Jasvinder Singh ..... Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal,

Brief Holder.

Counsel for the Informant : Mr. Lalit Sharma,

Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed by the

applicant seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.24 of 2024, registered at Police Station Transit Camp, District Udham Singh Nagar under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120B, 504 and Section 506 of the Indian Penal Code,

1860.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 29.01.2024, the co-accused Manjeet Singh dismantled the informant’s truck (Registration No.UA005-3266) and sold its parts as scrap and one canter (Registration No.UK006-CB0946) was misappropriated by him with the

connivance of the present applicant.

3. Heard Mr. Saurabh Kumar Pandey, learned

counsel for the applicant, Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, learned Brief Holder for the respondent and Mr. Lalit Sharma, learned counsel for the informant.

4. Mr.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top