SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 445043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJNISH BANSAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT

NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

18st AUGUST, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 881 of 2025

Rajnish Bansal …Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Another …Respondents Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Shubhash Chand Burman,

Advocate through video

conferencing.

Counsel for the Respondents : Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant

Government Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed by the

applicant – Rajnish Bansal for anticipatory bail in Case Crime No.89 of 2020 (Criminal Case No.5455 of 2021), registered at Police Station Dalanwala, District

Dehradun.

2. According to the First Information Report dated 14.06.2020, a Special Investigation Team was constituted in the scholarship scam matter. Sub- Inspector Manoj Negi was a member of the said Special Investigation Team. He enquired the matter. He found in the enquiry that funds of the scholarship were embezzled by Himalayan Group of Professional

Institution, Himachal Pradesh. Hence, the First Information Report was registered by him.

3. Heard Mr. Shubhash Chand Burman, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advo

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top