SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 448043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
JAWAHAR LAL AGARWAL – Appellant
Versus
HARISH SINGH KALAKOTI – Respondent


REPORTABLE

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Appeal From Order No. 548 of 2013

19 August, 2025

Jawahar Lal Agarwal

-Appellant

Versus

Harish Singh Kalakoti & another

--Respondents

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Bhupendra Singh, learned counsel for the appellant (appeared

through V.C.).

Mr. H.O. Bhakuni, learned counsel for respondent no.1.

Mr. Siddharth Bisht, learned counsel for respondent no.2.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon'ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

The present appeal has been filed by appellant-

owner, under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, (for short “the Act, 1988”) against the judgment and award dated 14.08.2013, passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/learned Additional District Judge, Nainital in M.A.C.P. Case No.154 of 2011, Harish Chand Kalakoti vs. Jawahar Lal Agarwal & others, whereby the Tribunal awarded a sum of Rs.1,30,562/-

against the appellant herein.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 09.04.2011, the respondent no.1-claimant was standing near Inspiration Public School, Kathgodam, and was talking with his friend Sunit Sharma. At that time, the driver of Vehicle No.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top