SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 454043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRAMOD CHANDRA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders

SL. or proceedings

Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

No or directions and

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

WPSS 1091/ 2025 WPSS 298/ 2024 WPSS 299/ 2024 WPSS 314/ 2024 WPSS 829/ 2024 WPSS 544/ 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate, for

the petitioners in WPSS/1091/2025.

Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, for

the petitioners in WPSS/298/2024 and

WPSS/299/2024.

Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate,

for the petitioner in WPSS/829/2024.

Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate,

for the petitioners in WPSS/544/2025.

Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing

Counsel, and Mr. N.K. Papnai, Standing

Counsel, for the State.

(2) After arguing for a while, learned Counsels for the petitioners submitted that since identical issue is pending consideration before Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal in Claim Petition No. 88/DB/2024 (Harsh D. Joshi v. State of Uttarakhand), therefore, these writ petitions along with entire record may also be relegated to the

Tribunal.

(3) Learned State Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned

Counsel for the petitioners.

(4) In such view of the matter,

these writ petitions along with entire records are transferred to Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal. The recor

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top