2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 454043
HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRAMOD CHANDRA PANDEY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 298 / 2024
Office Notes,
reports, orders
SL. or proceedings
Date COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
No or directions and
Registrar’s order
with Signatures
WPSS 1091/ 2025 WPSS 298/ 2024 WPSS 299/ 2024 WPSS 314/ 2024 WPSS 829/ 2024 WPSS 544/ 2024
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. M.C. Pant, Advocate, for
the petitioners in WPSS/1091/2025.
Mr. Nikhil Bhatt, Advocate, for
the petitioners in WPSS/298/2024 and
WPSS/299/2024.
Mr. Siddhartha Jain, Advocate,
for the petitioner in WPSS/829/2024.
Mr. Niranjan Bhatt, Advocate,
for the petitioners in WPSS/544/2025.
Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing
Counsel, and Mr. N.K. Papnai, Standing
Counsel, for the State.
(2) After arguing for a while, learned Counsels for the petitioners submitted that since identical issue is pending consideration before Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal in Claim Petition No. 88/DB/2024 (Harsh D. Joshi v. State of Uttarakhand), therefore, these writ petitions along with entire record may also be relegated to the
Tribunal.
(3) Learned State Counsel has no objection to the prayer made by learned
Counsel for the petitioners.
(4) In such view of the matter,
these writ petitions along with entire records are transferred to Uttarakhand Public Services Tribunal. The records shall be transmitted after replacing the original documents with the photocopy thereof.
(5) These writ petitions stand disposed of for statistical purposes.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
19.8.2025 Pr