HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
YAKUB – Appellant
Versus
SADAKAT – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or
S N L o . Date p d r ir o e c c e t e i d on in s g a s n o d r COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
Registrar’s order with Signatures
WPMS No.2429 of 2025
Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.
Mr. M.S. Tyagi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by
Mr. Sunil Chandra and Mr. Kailash Chandra, Advocates for
the petitioners.
2. Mr. Mr. Sudhir Nainwal, S.C. for the Sate.
3. Mr. Siddharth Singh, learned Advocate for the
respondent nos.1 and 2/Caveator.
4. There is a typographical error in the relief clause of the petition, as the name of the court has been inadvertently transcribed incorrectly, in the interest of justice learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct it during the course of the day and to supply the amended memo of
prayer clause as per the rule today itself.
5. This writ petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has put to challenge the order dated 25.06.2025 (annexure no.7) passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Garhwal Division, Dehradun, in Revision No.11/2024-25, Sri Yakub and another Vs. Sri Sadakat & others, under Section 219 of Land Revenue Act, 1901 (hereinafter referred to as “Act of 1901”), as
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.