SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 466043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
YAKUB – Appellant
Versus
SADAKAT – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or

S N L o . Date p d r ir o e c c e t e i d on in s g a s n o d r COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

Registrar’s order with Signatures

WPMS No.2429 of 2025

Hon’ble Pankaj Purohit, J.

Mr. M.S. Tyagi, learned Senior Advocate assisted by

Mr. Sunil Chandra and Mr. Kailash Chandra, Advocates for

the petitioners.

2. Mr. Mr. Sudhir Nainwal, S.C. for the Sate.

3. Mr. Siddharth Singh, learned Advocate for the

respondent nos.1 and 2/Caveator.

4. There is a typographical error in the relief clause of the petition, as the name of the court has been inadvertently transcribed incorrectly, in the interest of justice learned counsel for the petitioners is permitted to correct it during the course of the day and to supply the amended memo of

prayer clause as per the rule today itself.

5. This writ petition has been filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, whereby the petitioner has put to challenge the order dated 25.06.2025 (annexure no.7) passed by the learned Additional Commissioner, Garhwal Division, Dehradun, in Revision No.11/2024-25, Sri Yakub and another Vs. Sri Sadakat & others, under Section 219 of Land Revenue Act, 1901 (hereinafter referred to as “Act of 1901”), as

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top