HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
YAKOOB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
BA1 1422 / 2025
I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAI NI TAL
THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA
21st AUGUST, 2025
FI RST BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO.1422 of 2025
Yakoob ..…Applicant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent
Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Gaurav Singh,
Advocate.
Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Tumul Nainwal,
Assistant Government
Advocate assisted by
Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal,
Brief Holder.
Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.
Applicant-Yakoob is in judicial custody under
Section 5 read with Section 11 of the Uttarakhand Protection of Cow Progeny Act, 2007 in Case Crime No.715 of 2025, registered at Police Station Laksar,
District Haridwar.
2. According to the First Information Report dated 12.07.2025, the police party apprehended the applicant and recovered 4 kg. beef from his possession. 3. Heard Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel for the applicant and Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant
Government Advocate for respondent.
4. Mr. Gaurav Singh, Advocate, submitted that the police have falsely implicated the applicant. The alleged beef was not recovered from his possession. He is not a convicted person. He is a permanent resident of District Haridwar, therefore, there is no possibility of his absconding.
5. Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant Government Advocate, has opposed the bail application orally.
6. Bail is the rule and committal to jail is an exception. Refusal of bail is a restriction on the personal liberty of the individual, guaranteed under Article 21 of the Constitution of India. The object of keeping the accused person in detention during the investigation is not punishment. The main purpose is manifestly to secure the attendance of the accused.
7. Having considered the submissions of learned counsel for both the parties and in the facts and circumstances of the case, no reason is found to keep the applicant behind the bars for an indefinite period, therefore, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant deserves bail at this stage.
8. The Bail Application is allowed.
9. Let the applicant- Yakoob be released on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two reliable sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the court concerned.
___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.
Dt:21.08.2025 Neha NEHA Digitally signed by NEHA BISHT DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a803 8ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be753f014836d2 BISHT 7, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB967706845 2F32DE6BA960BFE64D819EE44 CA9CCE48
7B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.08.21 19:32:45 +05'30'
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.