SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 488043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
M/S BENETTON INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
SMT. SONI DEVI – Respondent


HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Appeal From Order No. 107 of 2019

21st August, 2025

M/s Benetton India Private Limited and another

………..Appellants

Versus

Smt. Soni Devi and Others ……..Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. Narendra Bali Advocate for the appellant.

Ms. Sangeeta Adhikari Patni, learned counsel for respondent nos.

1 to 6.

Mr. Pramod Bailwal, learned counsel for respondent no.7.

----------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Mr. Alok Mahra, J.

This appeal under Section 173 of the Motor

Vehicles Act, 1988, has been preferred by the appellant against the judgment and award dated 31.01.2019 passed by the learned M.A.C.T./2nd Additional District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar in M.A.C.P. No. 302 of 2016 “Smt. Soni Devi and Others Vs. M/s Benetton India Private Limited and Others”. By the said judgment, the learned Tribunal partly allowed the claim petition and awarded a compensation of ₹21,95,886/- against the appellant- Insurance Company, but granted the Insurance Company the right to recover the said amount from the appellant-owner/driver of the offending vehicle on

the principle of “pay and recov

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top