SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 495043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJENDRA KUMAR SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS/ 1385/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Deep Chandra Joshi, Advocate with

Mr. Pankaj Semwal, Advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. N.S. Pundir, Deputy Advocate

General for the State.

2. Petitioner is serving as Livestock Extension Officer in Government Animal Service Centre, Kalinagar, District Udham Singh Nagar. He was transferred to Animal Service Centre Dalkanya, District Nainital in public interest vide order dated 10.06.2025. Feeling aggrieved by his transfer, petitioner

filed this writ petition.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a divorcee, therefore, he is protected by the provision contained in Section 13(6) of Uttarakhand Annual Transfer for Public

Servants Act, 2017.

4. Learned State Counsel, however, submits that as per the judgment enclosed (Annexure-3 to the writ petition), decree of divorce was passed by Family Court, Udham Singh Nagar only on 28.05.2025. Whether that judgment was challenged before some higher forum or any interim order was passed against the said

judgment, is not known.

5. Learned State Counsel fur

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top