I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

21^ST AUGUST, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 943 OF 2025

Leeladhar ..... Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Others ..…Respondents

Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate

with Mr. Amit Satyawali,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Tumul Nainwal, Assistant

Nos.1 & 2 Government Advocate with

Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal, Brief

Holder.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate

No.3

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

This is an Application for anticipatory bail in

Case Crime No.51 of 2025, registered at Police Station Bhowali, District Nainital under Section 420 of Indian

Penal Code, 1860.

2. As per the First Information Report dated 11.08.2025, the co-accused made an agreement with the informant on 26.09.2023 to sell her property, but the sale-deed was not executed. The applicant was also

involved in the said fraud.

3. Heard Mr. Vikas Anand, learned counsel for the applicant, Mr. Tumul Nainwal, learned Assistant

Government Advocate for the respondent nos.1 & 2 and Mr. B.M. Pingal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3.

4. Mr. Vikas Anand, Advocate, contended that the applicant h