SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 505043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Bail Application No.1 of 2024

In

Criminal Revision No. 708 of 2024

Sandeep ......Revisionist (In Jail)

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand …..Respondent

Presence: Mr. Paritosh Dalakoti, learned counsel for the

Revisionist/Applicant.

Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

1. The present application has been moved under Section 430 of the

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking suspension of sentence and release on bail during the pendency of the Criminal Revision preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.07.2024, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun, in Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2018, Sandeep v. State of Uttarakhand, affirming the conviction of the Applicant/Revisionist under Sections 394, 411, and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with a modification of sentence under Section 411

IPC from five years to three years’ rigorous imprisonment.

2. The State’s case, briefly stated, is that on 07.09.2008, an FIR,

being Case Crime No. 26 of 2008, was lodged at Police Station

Vikasnagar by one Rampal Singh, alleging that while returning home, he was in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top