HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SANDEEP – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
Bail Application No.1 of 2024
In
Criminal Revision No. 708 of 2024
Sandeep ......Revisionist (In Jail)
Vs.
State of Uttarakhand …..Respondent
Presence: Mr. Paritosh Dalakoti, learned counsel for the
Revisionist/Applicant.
Mr. Akshay Latwal, learned AGA for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
1. The present application has been moved under Section 430 of the
Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, seeking suspension of sentence and release on bail during the pendency of the Criminal Revision preferred against the judgment and order dated 22.07.2024, passed by the learned Additional District and Sessions Judge, Vikasnagar, District Dehradun, in Criminal Appeal No. 20 of 2018, Sandeep v. State of Uttarakhand, affirming the conviction of the Applicant/Revisionist under Sections 394, 411, and 420 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, with a modification of sentence under Section 411
IPC from five years to three years’ rigorous imprisonment.
2. The State’s case, briefly stated, is that on 07.09.2008, an FIR,
being Case Crime No. 26 of 2008, was lodged at Police Station
Vikasnagar by one Rampal Singh, alleging that while returning home, he was in
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.