HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MANOJ KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
EXECUTIVE ENGINEER – Respondent
Reserved on:25.07.2025 Delivered on:25.08.2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
AT NAINITAL
Civil Writ Petition (M/S) No. 3472 of 2016
Manoj Kumar ......Petitioner
Vs.
Executive Engineer, Parikalp Khand …..Respondent
Presence
Mr. Pankaj Miglani, learned counsel for the Petitioner through VC.
Mr. V. D. Bisen, learned Standing Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.
1. This writ petition under Article 226 challenges the Order dated
01.10.2016 passed by the Labour Court, Haridwar, in Adjudication Case No. 53 of 2015. The Petitioner prays for the quashing of the
award and for a direction to reinstate him in service.
2. The Petitioner, Manoj Kumar, claims to have been engaged as a daily
wager Beldar with the Respondent department on muster roll basis for
the period 01.05.1986 to 27.06.1990.
3. According to the Petitioner, his services were illegally retrenched on
28.06.1990 without the issuance of any written order of termination. He was neither given an appointment letter at the time of engagement nor a
termination letter when his services were discontinued.
4. After a long interval, on 10.02.2014, the Petitioner raised an industrial
dispute. Along with the reference, he moved an
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.