SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back Icon Back Next Next Icon
AI icon Copy icon AI Message Bookmarks icon Share icon Up Arrow icon Down Arrow icon Zoom in icon Zoom Out icon Print Search icon Print icon Download icon Expand icon Close icon
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Sound Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 513043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MEERA PAPNAI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Reserved Judgment

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL

Writ Petition No. 1221 of 2022 (S/S)

Meera Papnai and Others ….....Petitioners

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Others ….….Respondents

Present:-

Mr. Vinay Kumar, Advocate for the petitioners.

Mr. Narayan Dutt, Standing Counsel for the State.

Mr. Ashish Joshi, Advocate for the Uttarakhand Public Service

Commission.

JUDGMENT

Per: Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J.

The challenge in this petition is made to the Final Result

dated 31.05.2022, published by the respondent no.3/Uttarakhand Public Service C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top