SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 526043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
NEERAJ FARTIYAL – Appellant
Versus
JOINT PRINCIPAL ADMINISTRATOR – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS/ 2432/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. R.C. Tamta, learned counsel for

the petitioner.

2. Mr. Suyash Pant, learned Standing

Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. Mr. Sandeep Kothari, learned

counsel for respondent nos. 2 & 3.

4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following

reliefs:-

(i) To, issue a writ, order or direction, in the nature of

certiorari calling for the records and quash order dated 06.06.2022, passed by the respondent no. 3 (Annexure No. 12 to this writ petition) i.e. District Development Authority, Nainital Through Secretary having its Office at Tallital Nainital, as well as to quash the order dated 11.12.2024 (Annexure No. 13 to this writ petition) passed by respondent no. 2 in the appeal no. 153/21-22(3/33-24) preferred by the petitioner as well as the order dated 31.05.2025 (Annexure No. 14 to this writ petition) passed by respondent no. 1 in the revision no. 0005/NDDA/2025-26 case no. 0028/2022 dated 03.07.2025 (Annexure No. 15 to this writ petition) whereby the petitioner has been directed to demolish the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top