SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 537043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
SUNIL KOTNALA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAINITAL

Criminal Writ Petition No.1097 of 2024

Sunil Kotnala and Another ......Petitioners

Vs.

State of Uttarakhand and ors. …..Respondents

Presence

Mr. Girish Kumar Arya, assisted by Mr. Vinay Mugdal,learned counsel for

the Petitioners.

Mr. Girish Ch. Joshi, learned brief holder for the State.

Mr. Naitik Bhatt, learned Counsel for Private Respondent.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

1. The present application under Section 482 of the Code of

Criminal Procedure has been preferred by the Petitioner seeking quashing of FIR No. 0592 of 2024 dated 19.09.2024, registered at Police Station Patel Nagar, Dehradun, and the proceedings emanating

therefrom.

2. The FIR in question was lodged by Respondent No. 2, alleging

that in the first week of April 2024, the Petitioner attempted to coerce the complainant into exchanging his plot with another situated at a prime location. It is further stated that upon the complainant’s refusal to comply with such a demand, he was subjected to threats and undue pressure, which ultimately culminated in the registration of the

present case.

3. On the basis of the said report, an investigation was commenced

by the police. The Petitioner, apprehend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top