SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 541043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ADESH GIRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS/ 93/ 2023

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. S.C. Bhatt, learned counsel for

the petitioner.

2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of

Uttarakhand.

3. According to petitioner, a road was constructed over his agricultural field in Raiwala, Tehsil Rishikesh, District Dehradun; however, compensation for such acquisition has not been paid to

him.

4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following

reliefs:-

(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the compensation of Khaswra no. 233Ka in Khata no. 291 whose rakva/area of land is 0.265 hector which has been taken by the respondents for public road at village Raywala, Tehsil Rishikesh,

District Dehradun, in favour of the petitioner.

(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of

mandamus directing the respondents to pay the compensation of Khasara no. 233Ka in Khata no. 291 whose rakva/area of land is 0.265 hector which has been taken by the respondents for public road at village Raywala. Tehsil

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top