HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ADESH GIRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPMS 93 / 2023
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPMS/ 93/ 2023
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. S.C. Bhatt, learned counsel for
the petitioner.
2. Mr. N.S. Pundir, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of
Uttarakhand.
3. According to petitioner, a road was constructed over his agricultural field in Raiwala, Tehsil Rishikesh, District Dehradun; however, compensation for such acquisition has not been paid to
him.
4. By means of this writ petition, petitioner has sought the following
reliefs:-
(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the compensation of Khaswra no. 233Ka in Khata no. 291 whose rakva/area of land is 0.265 hector which has been taken by the respondents for public road at village Raywala, Tehsil Rishikesh,
District Dehradun, in favour of the petitioner.
(ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of
mandamus directing the respondents to pay the compensation of Khasara no. 233Ka in Khata no. 291 whose rakva/area of land is 0.265 hector which has been taken by the respondents for public road at village Raywala. Tehsil Rishikesh, District Dehradun, along with interest in favour of the petitioner within in
stipulated time frame.
5. The stand taken in the counter affidavit is that the road in question was widened, however, petitioner’s land was
not acquired for construction of road.
6. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that District Magistrate,
Dehradun be directed to examine petitioner’s claim for compensation, as per law.
7. Learned State Counsel submits that he has no objection, if the petition is disposed of in terms of the prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner.
8. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of by permitting petitioner to make representation to District Magistrate, Dehradun for compensation. If he makes representation within three weeks from today, District Magistrate shall call a report from the Revenue Authority concerned and take decision, after hearing other stakeholders, within four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order along with representation.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)
27.08.2025 Aswal N SI I N T G I R H A A J SWAL DDo2aps30D e . D, u o iN a 5 r g c 8 = s t 2i . : n 4 a i 5 e t 6 t Hc a = l . : f a 2 N = F 9l I 2 l N C G0 5 I 8 u 0 yN o = IC H 0 m 2T s, d e 2 2 I5 i Co be a g a R. = 0 O = c eD 3 n A8 H r a2 U e AJ = 6 . 06 2 Id R CS G 7 4 83 7 T IF b 5 H b N 0 0 4 7 E y O 0 G5 C F e B18 N F H: 4 O 5 1 ,d I U 6 7 4 T s 3 U 1 A1 8 t T C I : 3 R = 2S0 R B 6 T W U C 1A A F 9 e 1 O T - R 0 J A 5 0 9 F AFS 1 L7 3 E AB I K 2 ' UN 5 0 R7 e H 8 f TG A6 a A A ' 8 9 H 3K AN9 58 0H A 3 8 RD C fA34 5 AS B , N ,f 3 WK 6 0 1 D H F 7 A 71, 4 A L 20 7 N 6CF D 2 0 B , C 5 E
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.