SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 542043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
M/S SHIFA ENTERPRISES MOHALLA SARAI AZIZ – Appellant
Versus
NAGAR PALIKA PARISHAD MANGLORE – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPMS No. 185 of 2025

With

WPMS No. 183 of 2025 WPMS No. 184 of 2025 WPMS No. 191 of 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Gaurav Singh, learned counsel

for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Devesh Bishnoi, learned counsel for the respondent-Nagar Palika Parishad

Manglour.

3. Since common questions of fact and law are involved in these petitions, therefore, these petitions are clubbed together and decided by this common judgment. However, for the sake of brevity and convenience, facts of WPMS No. 185 of 2025 alone are being

considered.

4. Petitioner is a petty contractor, who is registered with Nagar Palika Parishad Mangloure, District Haridwar. According to him, he was awarded contracts for different civil works, during Financial Year 2022-23 and petitioner completed the works to the satisfaction of

concerned Authority.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the Defect Liability Period, in respect of work done by petitioner, was only one year and there was no complaint of any nature in respect of work done by him, during one year

period.

6. The grievance raised b

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top