HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ANIL KUMAR RASANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
Office Notes,
reports, orders or proceedings
SL.
Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
No.
and Registrar’s
order with Signatures
WPSS/ 571/ 2024
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J
1. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned
counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, learned Standing
Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.
3. According to petitioner, he was engaged as daily wager for discharging duties as Helper in Irrigation Department in the year 1984; his services were terminated by oral order on 30.09.1988 against which petitioner raised an industrial dispute; learned Labour Court decided the dispute against the petitioner; petitioner challenged the award rendered by learned Labour Court in WPMS No. 425 of 2003, which was allowed and the matter was remanded back to Labour Court, and this time, learned Labour Court decided the reference in favour of petitioner vide award dated 14.08.2006 and petitioner was directed to be reinstated in service. The employer again challenged the said award before this Court by filing WPMS No. 277 of 2007, however, employer’s petition was dismissed by coordinate
Bench vide judgment dated 07.08.2008.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that petitioner was u
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.