SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 546043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
ANIL KUMAR RASANI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS/ 571/ 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned

counsel for the petitioner.

2. Mr. N.K. Papnoi, learned Standing

Counsel for the State of Uttarakhand.

3. According to petitioner, he was engaged as daily wager for discharging duties as Helper in Irrigation Department in the year 1984; his services were terminated by oral order on 30.09.1988 against which petitioner raised an industrial dispute; learned Labour Court decided the dispute against the petitioner; petitioner challenged the award rendered by learned Labour Court in WPMS No. 425 of 2003, which was allowed and the matter was remanded back to Labour Court, and this time, learned Labour Court decided the reference in favour of petitioner vide award dated 14.08.2006 and petitioner was directed to be reinstated in service. The employer again challenged the said award before this Court by filing WPMS No. 277 of 2007, however, employer’s petition was dismissed by coordinate

Bench vide judgment dated 07.08.2008.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner points out that petitioner was u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top