SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 564043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
PRADEEP KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

BA1 No.2075 of 2024

Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J.

Ms. Manisha Bhandari, Advocate for

the applicant.

Mr. Akshay Latwal, A.G.A. for the

State of Uttarahand.

2. This first bail application has been moved by the applicant seeking regular bail in Case Crime/F.I.R. No.6 of 2024, under Sections 420 and 120-B I.P.C. and Sections 3/21(3) Banning of Unregulated Deposit Schemes Act and Section 3 of Uttarakhand Protection of Interests of Depositors (in Financial Establishments), Act, registered at Police Station Srinagar,

District Pauri Garhwal.

3. An F.I.R. was lodged against five persons, including the applicant; that all the named persons were Director of the Private Ltd. Company; that the said company was incorporated for the benefit of the local farmers, but they took deposits from the local people, for which they were not granted any license; that the four named persons were granted bail by learned Special Judge (BUDS Act)/Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Dehradun, but since the applicant was the Managing Director of the said company, therefore, his bail was

rejected.

4. It is co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top