SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 571043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KAMLA SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
WPSS 1430 / 2025



Office Notes,

reports, orders or

S N L o . .

Date

p d r i o re c c e t e io d n in s g a s n o d r

COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

Registrar’s order with Signatures

WPSS 1430/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Vinod Tiwari, Advocate, for

the petitioner.

Mr. Dinesh Bankoti, Brief Holder,

for the State.

(2) Petitioner has been promoted as Assistant Teacher in Govt. Junior High School and transferred from Govt. Primary School, Jaspur to Govt. Junior High School, Balramnagar in Block Gadarpur. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that there is a vacancy of Assistant Teacher in Govt. Junior High School, Mahua Dabra and Govt. Junior High School, Babarkhera in Block Jaspur. He submits that vacancy in aforesaid two schools was not disclosed by the District Education Officer while inviting options for promotion and if those institutions were also indicated in the letter whereby options were invited, petitioner could

have opted for those schools.

(3) Learned State Counsel, per contra, submits that petitioner has been offered promotion in Govt. Junior High School, Balramnagar in Block Gadarpur and she wants promotion in the same block, close to her residence. He submits that since petitioner has served in Block Jaspur eversince she was appointed, therefore, she does not have any vested right to claim promotion in the same

block.

(4) I find substance in the submission of learned State Counsel. Even if there is a vacancy available in the

two schools, named by the petitioner, she cannot claim any vested right for her posting in the same block. However, having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is disposed of granting liberty to petitioner to make representation. If she makes representation, District Education Officer concerned shall look into the matter and take decision, as per law, within six weeks from the date of its presentation.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

29.8.2025 Pr PRABODH KUMARD2pcDen.oiNa5rgsti:4etPtca: aRN=l2 lCA0Iu0 yNoBm s,d3O5 iobega. n 8HHr8e262IdKG39UbD1MyC7CPA:95,RR5s3UAtE=4 Bf8T9 OUDT+ D10FHCAa5 KR'3T6U5MKEHA17R4NB3 K9aDH4f80NE2FD1Dc,5o08u6=H2AIfGCe aCOA4UBR56T81 aOf03F2UeDTFb6A1R9C8AdK54H862N5D073F, C9157BE3,

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top