SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 572043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
HANSA DATT UPADHYAY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAI NI TAL

Special Appeal No. 9 of 2016

Hansha Datt Upadhyay ---Appellant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand & others –Respondents -------------------------------------------------------------------

Presence:-

Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, learned Senior Counsel, assisted by Mr. C.S. Dalakoti,

learned counsel for the appellant.

Mr. K.N. Joshi, learned Deputy Advocate General for the State of Uttarakhand. -------------------------------------------------------------------

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

(Per: Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)

JUDGMENT

This intra-court appeal is filed by the writ-

petitioner challenging dismissal of his writ petition by learned Single Judge, vide judgment dated 01.12.2015,

rendered in Writ Petition (S/S) No. 996 of 2010.

2. In his writ petition, appellant had challenged order dated 27.04.2010, passed by Executive Engineer, Construction Division, Public Works Department, Nainital, whereby his claim for regularization was rejected on the ground that his case is not covered by Commission), Rules, 2002. The Executive Engineer had

given details about the number of days appellant served as daily wager in different years, which is as f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top