SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 597043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
Kusum Devi – Appellant
Versus
State of Uttarakhand – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS/ 1653/ 2023

With

WPSS Nos. 540/ 2025, 178/ 2024, 179/ 2024, 239/ 2024, 248/ 2024, 38/ 2025, 193/ 2025, 194/ 2025, 204/ 2025, 418/ 2025, 419/ 2025, 436/ 2025, 437/ 2025, 438/ 2025 and

542/ 2025

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.

Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocate for the petitioner(s)

Mr. M.C. Kandpal, Senior Advocate assisted by Mr.

Chitrarth Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner in WPSS

Nos. 540/2025 and 438/2025.

Mr. Ganesh Dutt Kandpal, Deputy Advocate General

with Mr. Rajeev Singh Bisth, Additional Chief Standing

Counsel for the State.

1. Petitioners in these writ petitions were appointed on compassionate ground as daily wager on account of death of the breadwinners in their family, who were serving in work charged establishment in different engineering

departments of the State.

2. According to petitioners, they have served for sufficiently long period of time; therefore, they are entitled to be given regular appointment, but their claim is not being

considered.

3. Since common questions of law and fact are involved in these petitions, therefore they are heard together and

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top