SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 625043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent


Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS No. 2408 of 2024

With

WPSS No. 2343 of 2024 WPSS No. 2371 of 2024 WPSS No. 2396 of 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Yogesh Pacholia, Mr. M.S. Bhyandari & Mr. Prashant Khanna,

Advocates for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Ashish Joshi & Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocates for the respondent-

Selecting Body.

3. Petitioners participated in a selection held by Uttarakhand Public Service Commissioner (in short “Selecting Body”) for the post of Additional Personal Secretary. The grievance raised by petitioners in these writ petitions is that during typing test, there was some technical glitch in the key-board of the computer, on which they were asked to give typing test and due to such glitch, considerable time was lost and petitioners could not complete

typing test.

4. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the Selecting Body submits that in terms of the order(s) passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court, on different dates, petitioners were permitted to again participate in the typing test, which were on-going, however, their result has not been declared so far, for want

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top