SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 625043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
MOHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UTTARAKHAND PUBLIC SERVICE COMMISSION – Respondent
WPSS 2343 / 2024



Office Notes,

reports, orders or proceedings

SL.

Date or directions COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS

No.

and Registrar’s

order with Signatures

WPSS No. 2408 of 2024

With

WPSS No. 2343 of 2024 WPSS No. 2371 of 2024 WPSS No. 2396 of 2024

Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J

1. Mr. Yogesh Pacholia, Mr. M.S. Bhyandari & Mr. Prashant Khanna,

Advocates for the petitioners.

2. Mr. Ashish Joshi & Mr. Pankaj Miglani, Advocates for the respondent-

Selecting Body.

3. Petitioners participated in a selection held by Uttarakhand Public Service Commissioner (in short “Selecting Body”) for the post of Additional Personal Secretary. The grievance raised by petitioners in these writ petitions is that during typing test, there was some technical glitch in the key-board of the computer, on which they were asked to give typing test and due to such glitch, considerable time was lost and petitioners could not complete

typing test.

4. Mr. Ashish Joshi, learned counsel for the Selecting Body submits that in terms of the order(s) passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court, on different dates, petitioners were permitted to again participate in the typing test, which were on-going, however, their result has not been declared so far, for want of

permission from this Court.

5. Learned counsel appearing for the Selecting Body prayed that Selecting

Body be permitted to declare the typing test result of the petitioners which is kept in a sealed envelope, pursuant to the order passed by Coordinate Bench of this Court.

6. Learned counsel for the petitioners also made similar prayer and submitted that since they were not responsible for the technical glitch, therefore, they cannot be made to suffer on account of mistake on the part of the Selecting Body.

7. In such view of the matter and also in view of the consensus between the parties, these writ petitions are disposed of by permitting the Uttarakhand Public Service Commission to declare the result of typing test of all the petitioners.

(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J)

03.09.2025 Aswal N SI I N T G I R H A A J SWAL DU2fs8D3e.5 TiN a 5,r g tpi :4ae 1 Atcol: a 72N =Rs l0tI u yN 6=mK lF s,eC5 i B o bag o. A=cn d9 NH r e6, D Id =c G748 , n2 b5H E y 3C NeB N 0: O 5I4T I74 TU8C R , R BsA6 1A FtJe=O -0 J9SUFS I3BN I T' UN 7GfTG 6AH89 H R9 8 A3R CSK4S BWHfWK 60AH F7N1L4L DN C,D 2 , o5E ua3 = D8H 25I 6 GfF9H 58 C0C2OaU D3R A0T C8 O Fb4 F08d1306C95F1E25e8aA350

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top