SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 629043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
EKESHWAR CHAURASIYA ALIAS KUNAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
C482 826 / 2024



Office Notes,

reports, orders or

proceedings or SL. Date

directions and COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS

No 2025:UHC:7846

Registrar’s order

with Signatures

(Compounding Appl. No.02 of 2025)

In

C482 No.826 of 2024

Hon’ble Ashish Naithani, J.

Mr. M.K. Ray, learned counsel for the

Applicant.

2. Mr. Bhaskar Chandra Joshi, learned AGA for

the State.

3. Mr. Pramod Kumar, learned counsel for

Respondent no.2.

4. Present application has been filed by the Applicant under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. alongwith compounding application and the same is supported with the affidavits of applicant and respondent no.2. 5. Applicant as well as respondent no.2 are present in the Court. They are duly identified by

their respective counsel.

6. By means of this C482 application, Applicant-Ekeshwar Chaurasiya @ Kunal has sought quashing of the impugned charge sheet dated 19.09.2022, cognizance/summoning order dated 04.03.2024 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.592 of 2024 State of Uttarakhand vs. Suraj Bisht and Another under Section 383, 341, 504, 506 of IPC pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/I Additional Civil Judge (SD),

Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar.

7. Learned counsel for the parties have filed their respective affidavits along with the do not wish to pursue the present criminal case any further and a compromise has been entered between

them.

8. Learned State counsel has opposed the

the offences are non-compoundable.

9. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record.

10. In view of the principle of law laid down by Ho’ble the Apex Court in the case of Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab reported in 2012 (10) SCC 303, criminal proceedings can be quashed by this Court, if this Court is satisfied that matter has been settled between the parties amicably and parties are interest to restore peace and harmony between them.

11. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and in view of the above, the compounding application is allowed. The entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.592 of 2024 State of Uttarakhand vs. Suraj Bisht and Another under Section 383, 341, 504, 506 of IPC pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate/I Additional Civil Judge (SD), Rudrapur, District Udham Singh Nagar qua the applicant are hereby quashed.

12. Accordingly instant Criminal Misc.

Application stands disposed of.

(Ashish Naithani, J.)

03.09.2025 Arti ARTI SNGH Dig:tca=ly s,onedb1CAO3RUTISN+GFH'Ku2.540879a6c1f3postlCUTARKHNDriumE4F5B, cnRTISNGH

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top