SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 630043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
RAJESH SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent
C482 852 / 2020



I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

03RD SEPTEMBER, 2025

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO.852 of 2020

Rajesh Singh .....Applicant

Versus

State of Uttarakhand and Others ..…Respondents Counsel for the Applicant : Mr. Lokendra Dobhal,

Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Tumul Nainwal,

No.1 Assistant Government

Advocate assisted by

Mr. Chitrarth Kandpal,

Brief Holder.

Counsel for the Respondent no.2/ : Mr. Kurban Ali,

Informant- victim Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent no.3/ : Mr. Pawan Sanwal,

victim Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed under

Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, by the applicant for quashing the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.3440 of 2020, “State vs. Rajesh Singh”, pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun under Section 420 of the Indian

Penal Code, 1860.

2. Heard Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, learned counsel

Government Advocate for the respondent no.1, Mr. Kurban Ali, learned counsel for the respondent no.2/informant-victim and Mr. Pawan Sanwal, learned counsel for the respondent no.3-victim.

3. The applicant-accused Rajesh Singh is present in-person. He is identified by Mr. Lokendra Dobhal, Advocate. The respondent no.2-Jagveer Singh Ashwal /informant-victim is present in-person. He is identified by Mr. Kurban Ali, Advocate. The respondent no.3-Ajay Panwar /informant-victim is present in- person. He is identified by Mr. Pawan Sanwal, Advocate.

4. Both, the applicant, the respondent no.2 and the respondent no.3 submitted that they have settled their private disputes. They have filed a Compounding Application (IA No.03 of 2025) and affidavits with their free will and without any pressure. They further submitted that after resolving their disputes, they are living peacefully and in harmony. The respondent no.2 and the respondent no.3 have requested to quash the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.3440 of 2020.

Government Advocate, submitted that the parties have settled their private disputes, therefore, the request of the respondent no.2 and respondent no.3 has not been opposed.

6. Considering the totality of the matter, this Court is of the view that ends of justice would be met if the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.3440 of 2020, “State vs. Rajesh Singh”, pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, are quashed.

7. Resultantly, the present Application filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, is allowed and the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.3440 of 2020, “State vs. Rajesh Singh”, pending before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, Dehradun, are hereby quashed.

___________________ ALOK KUMAR VERMA, J.

Dt:03.09.2025 Neha NEHA BISHT D D i N g : i t c a = l I y N s , i o g = n H e I d G b H y C N O E U H R A T B O IS F H U T T TARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=6f1c15b6305912b3f008e9a4a8038ee7326b08b2d0e018b01be753f014836d2

7, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=3D89DC33779FB9677068452F32D E6BA960BFE64D819EE44CA9CCE487 B2FE0F92, cn=NEHA BISHT Date: 2025.09.03 17:47:06 +05'30'

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top