SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(UK) 637043

HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND
KAUSHALYA DEVI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF UTTARAKHAND – Respondent


I N THE HI GH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND

AT NAI NI TAL

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTI CE ALOK KUMAR VERMA

03rd SEPTEMBER, 2025

ANTI CI PATORY BAI L APPLI CATI ON NO. 463 OF 2025

Smt. Kaushalya Devi and Others ..... Applicants

Versus

State of Uttarakhand ..…Respondent

Counsel for the Applicants : Mr. B.M. Pingal, Advocate.

Counsel for the Respondent : Mr. Sandeep Sharma, Assistant

Government Advocate.

Counsel for the Informant : Mr. Ravi Bisht, Advocate.

Hon’ble Alok Kumar Verma,J.

The present Application has been filed by the

applicants seeking anticipatory bail in Case Crime No. 152 of 2025, registered at Police Station Bazpur, District Udham Singh Nagar under Section 3(5) and Section

80(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. As per the First Information Report dated 28.04.2025, the informant’s sister, namely, Rajni Yadav alias Rakhi was married to Naresh Yadav, co-accused, on 11.12.2019. Her in-laws harassed her, demanding Rs.10,00,000/- in dowry. His sister died by consuming

poison on 26.04.2025.

3. Heard Mr. B.M. Pingal, learned counsel for the applicants, Mr. Sandeep Sharma, learned Assistant Government Advocate for the respondent and Mr. Ravi

Bisht, learned counsel for the informant.

4. Mr. Sandeep Sharma

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top